Article 1183
Article
1183. Impossible conditions, those contrary
to good customs or public policy and those prohibited by law shall annul the
obligation which depends upon them. If the obligation is divisible, that part
thereof which is not affected by the impossible or unlawful condition shall be
valid.
The condition not to do an impossible
thing shall be considered as not having been agreed upon.
Impossible Condition
the condition imposed is not capable of being performed
physically. Example: Grace will give Christine a gold necklace if she swims
across the Pacific Ocean.
Illegal or Illicit Condition
when the condition imposed is contrary to law, good custom
or public policy. Example: Contrary to law – Pedro agrees to give Ernesto
P100,000 if Ernesto will kill Mario. Contrary to good custom – Santos binds
himself to give Maria a gold wrist watch if she will cohabit with Mr. Reyes
without benefit of marriage. Contrary to public policy – Maria agrees to employ
Grace in her company if Grace will not join a labor union.
Negative Impossible Condition:
A Negative Impossible Conditions are
considered as not written. The condition is considered not imposed, and the
obligation must be regarded as a pure and simple one.
Example: “ I
will give you a million peso if you can turn the straw turn into gold. “
Or, “ I will give you all my assets when it would not rain in May. “
In, these cases, the
obligation is pure and immediately demandable, there is no need to wait for the
condition to happen.
Divisible Obligation
- that part of obligation which is not affected by
impossible or unlawful condition shall be valid (Art. 1183, NCC) Example- Pedro
promise to pay Juan the sum of P1, 000.00 if Juan furnishes Pedro with
information as to the whereabouts of Jane and another sum of P2,000.00 if Juan
kidnaps Jane, in the obligation, the
first part (to pay P1, 000.00) is valid while the second part (P2, 000.00) is
void because only the latter is affected by the condition. Express and Implied
.
Case
Luneta Motor Co., plaintiff-appelant
vs.
Federico Abad, defendant-appellee
Facts
Plaintiff sought recovery of the sum of P2674.05 with accrued stipulated interest and attorney's fees for balance due on four promissory notes executed by the defendant. While the case was on going the defendant died. The counsel for the defendant moved for the dismissal of the case. The trial court acceded to this motion, and the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration thereof has been denied, the instant appeal was taken. The case was rightly dismissed by the CA. The SC affirmed the judgement of the trial court.
Issue
Whether or not that the trial court erred on the dismissal of the case when the defendant died while the case was still on going.
Held
No, the case was rightly dismissed in accordance with section 119 of Act No. 190. And all actions commenced against a deceased person, for the recovery of money, debt , or damages, and pending at the time the committee are appointed, shall be discontinued, and the property, if any, therein attached, shall be discharged from the attachment, and the claim embraced in such action maybe presented to the committee. The impossibility existed when the person who was supposed to deliver the obligation died.
Many thanks & God bless.
Comments
Post a Comment